Daniela Fitzgerald vs Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses
2010 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniela Fitzgerald vs Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniela Fitzgerald (1295)
- Black
- Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses (1360)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniela Fitzgerald (1295) and Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses (1360) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniela Fitzgerald games or Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses games? This Daniela Fitzgerald vs Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniela Fitzgerald vs Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses?
Daniela Fitzgerald vs Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses.
What opening was played in Daniela Fitzgerald vs Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (ECO C55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniela Fitzgerald vs Luisa Fernanda Diaz Meneses, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.