David John Findlay vs Bernard Kernan
Glorney Cup, 1972 · Result ½–½ · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David John Findlay vs Bernard Kernan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David John Findlay (2290)
- Black
- Bernard Kernan (2300)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Glorney Cup
- Year
- 1972
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49)
About this chess game
This chess game between David John Findlay (2290) and Bernard Kernan (2300) was played at Glorney Cup in 1972 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David John Findlay games or Bernard Kernan games? This David John Findlay vs Bernard Kernan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David John Findlay vs Bernard Kernan?
David John Findlay vs Bernard Kernan (1972) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David John Findlay vs Bernard Kernan?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (ECO C49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David John Findlay vs Bernard Kernan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.