Davide Filice vs Daniele Tarelli
C.to Provinciale BG, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Davide Filice vs Daniele Tarelli with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Davide Filice (1716)
- Black
- Daniele Tarelli (1936)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- C.to Provinciale BG
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71)
About this chess game
This chess game between Davide Filice (1716) and Daniele Tarelli (1936) was played at C.to Provinciale BG in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Davide Filice games or Daniele Tarelli games? This Davide Filice vs Daniele Tarelli encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Davide Filice vs Daniele Tarelli?
Davide Filice vs Daniele Tarelli (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Davide Filice.
What opening was played in Davide Filice vs Daniele Tarelli?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (ECO B71).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Davide Filice vs Daniele Tarelli, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.