Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov vs Karl De Smet
CL/2012/C11, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov vs Karl De Smet with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov (2357)
- Black
- Karl De Smet (1657)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CL/2012/C11
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov (2357) and Karl De Smet (1657) was played at CL/2012/C11 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov games or Karl De Smet games? This Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov vs Karl De Smet encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov vs Karl De Smet?
Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov vs Karl De Smet (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov.
What opening was played in Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov vs Karl De Smet?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (ECO C57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksey Anatolievich Fetisov vs Karl De Smet, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.