Michel Liah Ferraz vs Enzo Federzoni
2019 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michel Liah Ferraz vs Enzo Federzoni with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michel Liah Ferraz (1582)
- Black
- Enzo Federzoni (2041)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michel Liah Ferraz (1582) and Enzo Federzoni (2041) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michel Liah Ferraz games or Enzo Federzoni games? This Michel Liah Ferraz vs Enzo Federzoni encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michel Liah Ferraz vs Enzo Federzoni?
Michel Liah Ferraz vs Enzo Federzoni (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Michel Liah Ferraz vs Enzo Federzoni?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michel Liah Ferraz vs Enzo Federzoni, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.