Luis Fernandez Siles vs Pedro Camacho Calle
XXXVII Open, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Fernandez Siles vs Pedro Camacho Calle with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Fernandez Siles (2364)
- Black
- Pedro Camacho Calle (2132)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- XXXVII Open
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Fernandez Siles (2364) and Pedro Camacho Calle (2132) was played at XXXVII Open in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Fernandez Siles games or Pedro Camacho Calle games? This Luis Fernandez Siles vs Pedro Camacho Calle encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Fernandez Siles vs Pedro Camacho Calle?
Luis Fernandez Siles vs Pedro Camacho Calle (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Luis Fernandez Siles vs Pedro Camacho Calle?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (ECO E14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Fernandez Siles vs Pedro Camacho Calle, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.