Antonio Fernandes vs Luis Neves Da Silva
POR Ch 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33).
Analyze this game
Open Antonio Fernandes vs Luis Neves Da Silva on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Fernandes (2375)
- Black
- Luis Neves Da Silva (2352)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- POR Ch 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Fernandes (2375) and Luis Neves Da Silva (2352) was played at POR Ch 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (A33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Fernandes games or Luis Neves Da Silva games? This Antonio Fernandes vs Luis Neves Da Silva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Fernandes vs Luis Neves Da Silva?
Antonio Fernandes vs Luis Neves Da Silva (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Antonio Fernandes.
What opening was played in Antonio Fernandes vs Luis Neves Da Silva?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Geller Variation (ECO A33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Fernandes vs Luis Neves Da Silva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.