Silas Carvalho Fernandes vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva
2010 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Silas Carvalho Fernandes vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Silas Carvalho Fernandes (2014)
- Black
- Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1951)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Silas Carvalho Fernandes (2014) and Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1951) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Silas Carvalho Fernandes games or Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva games? This Silas Carvalho Fernandes vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Silas Carvalho Fernandes vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva?
Silas Carvalho Fernandes vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Silas Carvalho Fernandes.
What opening was played in Silas Carvalho Fernandes vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Silas Carvalho Fernandes vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.