Stefan Fedorko vs Peter Zavacky
Kosice CZE, Open 2010, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stefan Fedorko vs Peter Zavacky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stefan Fedorko (2077)
- Black
- Peter Zavacky (2111)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Kosice CZE, Open 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stefan Fedorko (2077) and Peter Zavacky (2111) was played at Kosice CZE, Open 2010 in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stefan Fedorko games or Peter Zavacky games? This Stefan Fedorko vs Peter Zavacky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stefan Fedorko vs Peter Zavacky?
Stefan Fedorko vs Peter Zavacky (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Stefan Fedorko vs Peter Zavacky?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stefan Fedorko vs Peter Zavacky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.