Akmal Fayzullaev vs Gabriel Sargissian
Kasimdzhanov Challengers, 2023 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Akmal Fayzullaev vs Gabriel Sargissian with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Akmal Fayzullaev (2391)
- Black
- Gabriel Sargissian (2699)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Kasimdzhanov Challengers
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Akmal Fayzullaev (2391) and Gabriel Sargissian (2699) was played at Kasimdzhanov Challengers in 2023 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Akmal Fayzullaev games or Gabriel Sargissian games? This Akmal Fayzullaev vs Gabriel Sargissian encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Akmal Fayzullaev vs Gabriel Sargissian?
Akmal Fayzullaev vs Gabriel Sargissian (2023) finished 0–1, a win for Gabriel Sargissian.
What opening was played in Akmal Fayzullaev vs Gabriel Sargissian?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (ECO D53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Akmal Fayzullaev vs Gabriel Sargissian, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.