Tomas Alves Faustino vs Antonio Adalberto O Mendes
POR/PA/11/38 (POR), 2011 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Classical Variation (C64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tomas Alves Faustino vs Antonio Adalberto O Mendes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tomas Alves Faustino
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- POR/PA/11/38 (POR)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Classical Variation (C64)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tomas Alves Faustino and Antonio Adalberto O Mendes was played at POR/PA/11/38 (POR) in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Classical Variation (C64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tomas Alves Faustino games or Antonio Adalberto O Mendes games? This Tomas Alves Faustino vs Antonio Adalberto O Mendes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tomas Alves Faustino vs Antonio Adalberto O Mendes?
Tomas Alves Faustino vs Antonio Adalberto O Mendes (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Antonio Adalberto O Mendes.
What opening was played in Tomas Alves Faustino vs Antonio Adalberto O Mendes?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Classical Variation (ECO C64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tomas Alves Faustino vs Antonio Adalberto O Mendes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.