Ferenc Farkas vs Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah
2005 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ferenc Farkas vs Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ferenc Farkas (1881)
- Black
- Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah (1954)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ferenc Farkas (1881) and Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah (1954) was played in 2005 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ferenc Farkas games or Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah games? This Ferenc Farkas vs Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ferenc Farkas vs Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah?
Ferenc Farkas vs Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah (2005) finished 0–1, a win for Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah.
What opening was played in Ferenc Farkas vs Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (ECO D35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ferenc Farkas vs Natalie Fuad Kamel Jamaliah, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.