Edilsom Farias vs Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses
2018 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense (D07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Edilsom Farias vs Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Edilsom Farias (1886)
- Black
- Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses (1966)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense (D07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Edilsom Farias (1886) and Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses (1966) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense (D07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Edilsom Farias games or Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses games? This Edilsom Farias vs Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Edilsom Farias vs Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses?
Edilsom Farias vs Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses.
What opening was played in Edilsom Farias vs Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense (ECO D07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Edilsom Farias vs Lourenco Teixeira D Meneses, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.