Daniel Landshoff Farah vs Luis Fernando Alves Silva
2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Landshoff Farah vs Luis Fernando Alves Silva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Landshoff Farah (1951)
- Black
- Luis Fernando Alves Silva (1647)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Landshoff Farah (1951) and Luis Fernando Alves Silva (1647) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Landshoff Farah games or Luis Fernando Alves Silva games? This Daniel Landshoff Farah vs Luis Fernando Alves Silva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Landshoff Farah vs Luis Fernando Alves Silva?
Daniel Landshoff Farah vs Luis Fernando Alves Silva (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Daniel Landshoff Farah.
What opening was played in Daniel Landshoff Farah vs Luis Fernando Alves Silva?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Landshoff Farah vs Luis Fernando Alves Silva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.