Sandor Farago vs Patrick Scharrer
FSIM Sept 2012, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (B34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sandor Farago vs Patrick Scharrer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sandor Farago (2259)
- Black
- Patrick Scharrer (2256)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FSIM Sept 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (B34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sandor Farago (2259) and Patrick Scharrer (2256) was played at FSIM Sept 2012 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (B34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sandor Farago games or Patrick Scharrer games? This Sandor Farago vs Patrick Scharrer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sandor Farago vs Patrick Scharrer?
Sandor Farago vs Patrick Scharrer (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Sandor Farago.
What opening was played in Sandor Farago vs Patrick Scharrer?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (ECO B34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sandor Farago vs Patrick Scharrer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.