Nicholas Fallowfield vs Nathan Madzia
32. 4NCL Congress, 2025 · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nicholas Fallowfield vs Nathan Madzia with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nicholas Fallowfield (1822)
- Black
- Nathan Madzia (1867)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 32. 4NCL Congress
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nicholas Fallowfield (1822) and Nathan Madzia (1867) was played at 32. 4NCL Congress in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nicholas Fallowfield games or Nathan Madzia games? This Nicholas Fallowfield vs Nathan Madzia encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nicholas Fallowfield vs Nathan Madzia?
Nicholas Fallowfield vs Nathan Madzia (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Nicholas Fallowfield.
What opening was played in Nicholas Fallowfield vs Nathan Madzia?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nicholas Fallowfield vs Nathan Madzia, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.