Ivan Faleev vs Anton Golubkov
Vladivostok RUS, Open 2010, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivan Faleev vs Anton Golubkov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivan Faleev (2064)
- Black
- Anton Golubkov (2302)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Vladivostok RUS, Open 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivan Faleev (2064) and Anton Golubkov (2302) was played at Vladivostok RUS, Open 2010 in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivan Faleev games or Anton Golubkov games? This Ivan Faleev vs Anton Golubkov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivan Faleev vs Anton Golubkov?
Ivan Faleev vs Anton Golubkov (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ivan Faleev vs Anton Golubkov?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (ECO D86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivan Faleev vs Anton Golubkov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.