Jakob Fahlman vs Jung Min Seo
Robert Spangbergs Memorial, 2024 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jakob Fahlman vs Jung Min Seo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jakob Fahlman (1662)
- Black
- Jung Min Seo (2466)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Robert Spangbergs Memorial
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jakob Fahlman (1662) and Jung Min Seo (2466) was played at Robert Spangbergs Memorial in 2024 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jakob Fahlman games or Jung Min Seo games? This Jakob Fahlman vs Jung Min Seo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jakob Fahlman vs Jung Min Seo?
Jakob Fahlman vs Jung Min Seo (2024) finished 0–1, a win for Jung Min Seo.
What opening was played in Jakob Fahlman vs Jung Min Seo?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jakob Fahlman vs Jung Min Seo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.