Harald Faber vs Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko
16. IECG WCH-T-00004, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Harald Faber vs Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Harald Faber (2343)
- Black
- Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko (2351)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 16. IECG WCH-T-00004
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Harald Faber (2343) and Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko (2351) was played at 16. IECG WCH-T-00004 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Harald Faber games or Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko games? This Harald Faber vs Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Harald Faber vs Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko?
Harald Faber vs Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko.
What opening was played in Harald Faber vs Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Harald Faber vs Nikolai Nikolaevich Kizimenko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.