Rod Ewan vs Praveen Kumar Rallabandi
WLS/MemOrg/2016 (WLS), 2016 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rod Ewan vs Praveen Kumar Rallabandi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rod Ewan (2236)
- Black
- Praveen Kumar Rallabandi (1765)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WLS/MemOrg/2016 (WLS)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rod Ewan (2236) and Praveen Kumar Rallabandi (1765) was played at WLS/MemOrg/2016 (WLS) in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rod Ewan games or Praveen Kumar Rallabandi games? This Rod Ewan vs Praveen Kumar Rallabandi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rod Ewan vs Praveen Kumar Rallabandi?
Rod Ewan vs Praveen Kumar Rallabandi (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rod Ewan vs Praveen Kumar Rallabandi?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (ECO C67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rod Ewan vs Praveen Kumar Rallabandi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.