Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco vs Eddy De los Santos Nunez
2010 · Result ½–½ · Alekhine Defense (B02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco vs Eddy De los Santos Nunez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco (2086)
- Black
- Eddy De los Santos Nunez (2150)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Alekhine Defense (B02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco (2086) and Eddy De los Santos Nunez (2150) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Alekhine Defense (B02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco games or Eddy De los Santos Nunez games? This Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco vs Eddy De los Santos Nunez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Alekhine Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco vs Eddy De los Santos Nunez?
Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco vs Eddy De los Santos Nunez (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco vs Eddy De los Santos Nunez?
The game opened with the Alekhine Defense (ECO B02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonardo Rafael Estevez Polanco vs Eddy De los Santos Nunez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.