Ramon Estevez Abeytua vs Gustavo Jimenez Martin
2016 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ramon Estevez Abeytua vs Gustavo Jimenez Martin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ramon Estevez Abeytua (1727)
- Black
- Gustavo Jimenez Martin (2169)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ramon Estevez Abeytua (1727) and Gustavo Jimenez Martin (2169) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ramon Estevez Abeytua games or Gustavo Jimenez Martin games? This Ramon Estevez Abeytua vs Gustavo Jimenez Martin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ramon Estevez Abeytua vs Gustavo Jimenez Martin?
Ramon Estevez Abeytua vs Gustavo Jimenez Martin (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Gustavo Jimenez Martin.
What opening was played in Ramon Estevez Abeytua vs Gustavo Jimenez Martin?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ramon Estevez Abeytua vs Gustavo Jimenez Martin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.