Alexandre Espreafico vs Fabio De Fatima Sousa
2009 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandre Espreafico vs Fabio De Fatima Sousa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandre Espreafico
- Black
- Fabio De Fatima Sousa (1764)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandre Espreafico and Fabio De Fatima Sousa (1764) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandre Espreafico games or Fabio De Fatima Sousa games? This Alexandre Espreafico vs Fabio De Fatima Sousa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandre Espreafico vs Fabio De Fatima Sousa?
Alexandre Espreafico vs Fabio De Fatima Sousa (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Fabio De Fatima Sousa.
What opening was played in Alexandre Espreafico vs Fabio De Fatima Sousa?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (ECO B52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandre Espreafico vs Fabio De Fatima Sousa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.