Luca Esposito vs Clive Murden
MT-Pyrich/S02 (SCO), 2018 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luca Esposito vs Clive Murden with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luca Esposito (2224)
- Black
- Clive Murden (2434)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- MT-Pyrich/S02 (SCO)
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luca Esposito (2224) and Clive Murden (2434) was played at MT-Pyrich/S02 (SCO) in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luca Esposito games or Clive Murden games? This Luca Esposito vs Clive Murden encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luca Esposito vs Clive Murden?
Luca Esposito vs Clive Murden (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Luca Esposito.
What opening was played in Luca Esposito vs Clive Murden?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luca Esposito vs Clive Murden, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.