Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera vs Juan Jose Perez Rivero
2019 · Result 0–1 · Petrov's Defense (C42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera vs Juan Jose Perez Rivero with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera (1392)
- Black
- Juan Jose Perez Rivero (1826)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense (C42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera (1392) and Juan Jose Perez Rivero (1826) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Petrov's Defense (C42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera games or Juan Jose Perez Rivero games? This Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera vs Juan Jose Perez Rivero encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera vs Juan Jose Perez Rivero?
Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera vs Juan Jose Perez Rivero (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Juan Jose Perez Rivero.
What opening was played in Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera vs Juan Jose Perez Rivero?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense (ECO C42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Flavio Fabrizio Escorcia Herrera vs Juan Jose Perez Rivero, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.