Jaime Escoms Monzo vs Alfonso Martinez Escandell
2010 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaime Escoms Monzo vs Alfonso Martinez Escandell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaime Escoms Monzo (1848)
- Black
- Alfonso Martinez Escandell (2007)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaime Escoms Monzo (1848) and Alfonso Martinez Escandell (2007) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaime Escoms Monzo games or Alfonso Martinez Escandell games? This Jaime Escoms Monzo vs Alfonso Martinez Escandell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaime Escoms Monzo vs Alfonso Martinez Escandell?
Jaime Escoms Monzo vs Alfonso Martinez Escandell (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jaime Escoms Monzo vs Alfonso Martinez Escandell?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaime Escoms Monzo vs Alfonso Martinez Escandell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.