Alder Escobar Forero vs Duvan Martin Castano
Pereira COL, Villegas Mem 2014, 2014 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alder Escobar Forero vs Duvan Martin Castano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alder Escobar Forero (2482)
- Black
- Duvan Martin Castano (2317)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Pereira COL, Villegas Mem 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alder Escobar Forero (2482) and Duvan Martin Castano (2317) was played at Pereira COL, Villegas Mem 2014 in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alder Escobar Forero games or Duvan Martin Castano games? This Alder Escobar Forero vs Duvan Martin Castano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alder Escobar Forero vs Duvan Martin Castano?
Alder Escobar Forero vs Duvan Martin Castano (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Alder Escobar Forero.
What opening was played in Alder Escobar Forero vs Duvan Martin Castano?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alder Escobar Forero vs Duvan Martin Castano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.