Vasilij Esaulov vs Evgenij Dubonosov
2008 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vasilij Esaulov vs Evgenij Dubonosov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vasilij Esaulov (2086)
- Black
- Evgenij Dubonosov (2082)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vasilij Esaulov (2086) and Evgenij Dubonosov (2082) was played in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vasilij Esaulov games or Evgenij Dubonosov games? This Vasilij Esaulov vs Evgenij Dubonosov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vasilij Esaulov vs Evgenij Dubonosov?
Vasilij Esaulov vs Evgenij Dubonosov (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Evgenij Dubonosov.
What opening was played in Vasilij Esaulov vs Evgenij Dubonosov?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vasilij Esaulov vs Evgenij Dubonosov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.