Vidar Erlandsen vs Jan Raymond Holmboe
Sandefjord, 2004 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vidar Erlandsen vs Jan Raymond Holmboe with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vidar Erlandsen (1820)
- Black
- Jan Raymond Holmboe (1717)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Sandefjord
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vidar Erlandsen (1820) and Jan Raymond Holmboe (1717) was played at Sandefjord in 2004 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vidar Erlandsen games or Jan Raymond Holmboe games? This Vidar Erlandsen vs Jan Raymond Holmboe encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vidar Erlandsen vs Jan Raymond Holmboe?
Vidar Erlandsen vs Jan Raymond Holmboe (2004) finished 1–0, a win for Vidar Erlandsen.
What opening was played in Vidar Erlandsen vs Jan Raymond Holmboe?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (ECO C57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vidar Erlandsen vs Jan Raymond Holmboe, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.