Bengt Eriksson 1951 vs Petr Vachtfeidl
4. London Classic Open, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bengt Eriksson 1951 vs Petr Vachtfeidl with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bengt Eriksson 1951 (2154)
- Black
- Petr Vachtfeidl (1945)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 4. London Classic Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bengt Eriksson 1951 (2154) and Petr Vachtfeidl (1945) was played at 4. London Classic Open in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bengt Eriksson 1951 games or Petr Vachtfeidl games? This Bengt Eriksson 1951 vs Petr Vachtfeidl encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bengt Eriksson 1951 vs Petr Vachtfeidl?
Bengt Eriksson 1951 vs Petr Vachtfeidl (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Bengt Eriksson 1951.
What opening was played in Bengt Eriksson 1951 vs Petr Vachtfeidl?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bengt Eriksson 1951 vs Petr Vachtfeidl, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.