Dagfinn Eriksen vs Jo Ingebrigt Larsen
Hammerfest, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dagfinn Eriksen vs Jo Ingebrigt Larsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dagfinn Eriksen
- Black
- Jo Ingebrigt Larsen (1617)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Hammerfest
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dagfinn Eriksen and Jo Ingebrigt Larsen (1617) was played at Hammerfest and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dagfinn Eriksen games or Jo Ingebrigt Larsen games? This Dagfinn Eriksen vs Jo Ingebrigt Larsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dagfinn Eriksen vs Jo Ingebrigt Larsen?
Dagfinn Eriksen vs Jo Ingebrigt Larsen finished 1–0, a win for Dagfinn Eriksen.
What opening was played in Dagfinn Eriksen vs Jo Ingebrigt Larsen?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (ECO D87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dagfinn Eriksen vs Jo Ingebrigt Larsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.