Mykola Enkalo vs Gediminas J Voveris
WLS/SRCCC/17/D1 (WLS), 2017 · Result ½–½ · Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (E08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mykola Enkalo vs Gediminas J Voveris with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mykola Enkalo (2358)
- Black
- Gediminas J Voveris (2352)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WLS/SRCCC/17/D1 (WLS)
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (E08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mykola Enkalo (2358) and Gediminas J Voveris (2352) was played at WLS/SRCCC/17/D1 (WLS) in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (E08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mykola Enkalo games or Gediminas J Voveris games? This Mykola Enkalo vs Gediminas J Voveris encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mykola Enkalo vs Gediminas J Voveris?
Mykola Enkalo vs Gediminas J Voveris (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mykola Enkalo vs Gediminas J Voveris?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (ECO E08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mykola Enkalo vs Gediminas J Voveris, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.