Fred Englert vs Yvonne Mao
2013 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fred Englert vs Yvonne Mao with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fred Englert (1841)
- Black
- Yvonne Mao (1613)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fred Englert (1841) and Yvonne Mao (1613) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fred Englert games or Yvonne Mao games? This Fred Englert vs Yvonne Mao encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fred Englert vs Yvonne Mao?
Fred Englert vs Yvonne Mao (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Fred Englert.
What opening was played in Fred Englert vs Yvonne Mao?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fred Englert vs Yvonne Mao, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.