Barbara Englert vs Mark Heidenfeld
Wurtemberg, 1987 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Barbara Englert vs Mark Heidenfeld with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Barbara Englert (1286)
- Black
- Mark Heidenfeld (2290)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Wurtemberg
- Year
- 1987
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Barbara Englert (1286) and Mark Heidenfeld (2290) was played at Wurtemberg in 1987 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Barbara Englert games or Mark Heidenfeld games? This Barbara Englert vs Mark Heidenfeld encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Barbara Englert vs Mark Heidenfeld?
Barbara Englert vs Mark Heidenfeld (1987) finished 1–0, a win for Barbara Englert.
What opening was played in Barbara Englert vs Mark Heidenfeld?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Barbara Englert vs Mark Heidenfeld, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.