Barry E Endsley vs Stanley J Jarosz
USCF/WS/11MI01 (USA), 2011 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Barry E Endsley vs Stanley J Jarosz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Barry E Endsley (1747)
- Black
- Stanley J Jarosz (2154)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- USCF/WS/11MI01 (USA)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Barry E Endsley (1747) and Stanley J Jarosz (2154) was played at USCF/WS/11MI01 (USA) in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Barry E Endsley games or Stanley J Jarosz games? This Barry E Endsley vs Stanley J Jarosz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Barry E Endsley vs Stanley J Jarosz?
Barry E Endsley vs Stanley J Jarosz (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Barry E Endsley.
What opening was played in Barry E Endsley vs Stanley J Jarosz?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Barry E Endsley vs Stanley J Jarosz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.