Manfred Enders vs Robert Hoerstrup
Ruhrgebiet VK1 9900, 2000 · Result ½–½ · Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense (A63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manfred Enders vs Robert Hoerstrup with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manfred Enders
- Black
- Robert Hoerstrup (1606)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Ruhrgebiet VK1 9900
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense (A63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manfred Enders and Robert Hoerstrup (1606) was played at Ruhrgebiet VK1 9900 in 2000 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense (A63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manfred Enders games or Robert Hoerstrup games? This Manfred Enders vs Robert Hoerstrup encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manfred Enders vs Robert Hoerstrup?
Manfred Enders vs Robert Hoerstrup (2000) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Manfred Enders vs Robert Hoerstrup?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense (ECO A63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manfred Enders vs Robert Hoerstrup, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.