Andrew Endean vs Harald Wilhelms
CL2-2001.38.04, 2001 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andrew Endean vs Harald Wilhelms with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andrew Endean (1727)
- Black
- Harald Wilhelms (1824)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CL2-2001.38.04
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andrew Endean (1727) and Harald Wilhelms (1824) was played at CL2-2001.38.04 in 2001 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andrew Endean games or Harald Wilhelms games? This Andrew Endean vs Harald Wilhelms encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andrew Endean vs Harald Wilhelms?
Andrew Endean vs Harald Wilhelms (2001) finished 1–0, a win for Andrew Endean.
What opening was played in Andrew Endean vs Harald Wilhelms?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (ECO D19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andrew Endean vs Harald Wilhelms, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.