Harel Elyoseph vs Manfred Schütze
Israeli CC 2021 (ISR), 2021 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Harel Elyoseph vs Manfred Schütze with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Harel Elyoseph (2280)
- Black
- Manfred Schütze (1731)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Israeli CC 2021 (ISR)
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Harel Elyoseph (2280) and Manfred Schütze (1731) was played at Israeli CC 2021 (ISR) in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Harel Elyoseph games or Manfred Schütze games? This Harel Elyoseph vs Manfred Schütze encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Harel Elyoseph vs Manfred Schütze?
Harel Elyoseph vs Manfred Schütze (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Harel Elyoseph vs Manfred Schütze?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (ECO A88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Harel Elyoseph vs Manfred Schütze, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.