John W Ellis vs David A Blair
Canadian Open U2000, 2006 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay John W Ellis vs David A Blair with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- John W Ellis (1767)
- Black
- David A Blair (1908)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Canadian Open U2000
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31)
About this chess game
This chess game between John W Ellis (1767) and David A Blair (1908) was played at Canadian Open U2000 in 2006 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more John W Ellis games or David A Blair games? This John W Ellis vs David A Blair encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won John W Ellis vs David A Blair?
John W Ellis vs David A Blair (2006) finished 0–1, a win for David A Blair.
What opening was played in John W Ellis vs David A Blair?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (ECO A31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of John W Ellis vs David A Blair, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.