Tim Elgar vs Alex Golding
Isle of Wight International, 2025 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tim Elgar vs Alex Golding with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tim Elgar (2104)
- Black
- Alex Golding (2365)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Isle of Wight International
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tim Elgar (2104) and Alex Golding (2365) was played at Isle of Wight International in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tim Elgar games or Alex Golding games? This Tim Elgar vs Alex Golding encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tim Elgar vs Alex Golding?
Tim Elgar vs Alex Golding (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Tim Elgar.
What opening was played in Tim Elgar vs Alex Golding?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tim Elgar vs Alex Golding, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.