Brian Eley vs Roger D De Coverly
Amersham, 1987 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Brian Eley vs Roger D De Coverly with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Brian Eley
- Black
- Roger D De Coverly (2130)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Amersham
- Year
- 1987
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Brian Eley and Roger D De Coverly (2130) was played at Amersham in 1987 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Brian Eley games or Roger D De Coverly games? This Brian Eley vs Roger D De Coverly encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Brian Eley vs Roger D De Coverly?
Brian Eley vs Roger D De Coverly (1987) finished 1–0, a win for Brian Eley.
What opening was played in Brian Eley vs Roger D De Coverly?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Brian Eley vs Roger D De Coverly, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.