Leif Eldridge-Smith vs Brian Mengelkamp
AUS/2018/1500/1 (AUS), 2018 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B62).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leif Eldridge-Smith vs Brian Mengelkamp with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leif Eldridge-Smith
- Black
- Brian Mengelkamp (1540)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- AUS/2018/1500/1 (AUS)
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B62)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leif Eldridge-Smith and Brian Mengelkamp (1540) was played at AUS/2018/1500/1 (AUS) in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B62). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leif Eldridge-Smith games or Brian Mengelkamp games? This Leif Eldridge-Smith vs Brian Mengelkamp encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leif Eldridge-Smith vs Brian Mengelkamp?
Leif Eldridge-Smith vs Brian Mengelkamp (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Brian Mengelkamp.
What opening was played in Leif Eldridge-Smith vs Brian Mengelkamp?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (ECO B62).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leif Eldridge-Smith vs Brian Mengelkamp, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.