Andrey Efimov vs Nikolai Pokazanjev
date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andrey Efimov vs Nikolai Pokazanjev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andrey Efimov (2139)
- Black
- Nikolai Pokazanjev (2446)
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andrey Efimov (2139) and Nikolai Pokazanjev (2446) was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andrey Efimov games or Nikolai Pokazanjev games? This Andrey Efimov vs Nikolai Pokazanjev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andrey Efimov vs Nikolai Pokazanjev?
Andrey Efimov vs Nikolai Pokazanjev finished 0–1, a win for Nikolai Pokazanjev.
What opening was played in Andrey Efimov vs Nikolai Pokazanjev?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (ECO A36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andrey Efimov vs Nikolai Pokazanjev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.