David M Edwards vs Michael Macdonald-Ross
4NCL/Div3/SCS vs. MKE, 2001 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (B16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David M Edwards vs Michael Macdonald-Ross with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David M Edwards (2177)
- Black
- Michael Macdonald-Ross (2172)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL/Div3/SCS vs. MKE
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (B16)
About this chess game
This chess game between David M Edwards (2177) and Michael Macdonald-Ross (2172) was played at 4NCL/Div3/SCS vs. MKE in 2001 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (B16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David M Edwards games or Michael Macdonald-Ross games? This David M Edwards vs Michael Macdonald-Ross encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David M Edwards vs Michael Macdonald-Ross?
David M Edwards vs Michael Macdonald-Ross (2001) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David M Edwards vs Michael Macdonald-Ross?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (ECO B16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David M Edwards vs Michael Macdonald-Ross, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.