Rafael Rohling Eckert vs Armin Zimber
Oberliga Wuert9192, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rafael Rohling Eckert vs Armin Zimber with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rafael Rohling Eckert (1421)
- Black
- Armin Zimber (2105)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Oberliga Wuert9192
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rafael Rohling Eckert (1421) and Armin Zimber (2105) was played at Oberliga Wuert9192 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rafael Rohling Eckert games or Armin Zimber games? This Rafael Rohling Eckert vs Armin Zimber encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rafael Rohling Eckert vs Armin Zimber?
Rafael Rohling Eckert vs Armin Zimber finished 0–1, a win for Armin Zimber.
What opening was played in Rafael Rohling Eckert vs Armin Zimber?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rafael Rohling Eckert vs Armin Zimber, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.