David Eckert vs Dagur Ragnarsson
Montreal Winter IM 2019, 2019 · Result 0–1 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Eckert vs Dagur Ragnarsson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Eckert (1746)
- Black
- Dagur Ragnarsson (2327)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Montreal Winter IM 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Eckert (1746) and Dagur Ragnarsson (2327) was played at Montreal Winter IM 2019 in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Eckert games or Dagur Ragnarsson games? This David Eckert vs Dagur Ragnarsson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Eckert vs Dagur Ragnarsson?
David Eckert vs Dagur Ragnarsson (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Dagur Ragnarsson.
What opening was played in David Eckert vs Dagur Ragnarsson?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (ECO C49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Eckert vs Dagur Ragnarsson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.