Jan Dvorak vs Martin Vacek
2011 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jan Dvorak vs Martin Vacek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jan Dvorak (2175)
- Black
- Martin Vacek (2305)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jan Dvorak (2175) and Martin Vacek (2305) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jan Dvorak games or Martin Vacek games? This Jan Dvorak vs Martin Vacek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jan Dvorak vs Martin Vacek?
Jan Dvorak vs Martin Vacek (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Martin Vacek.
What opening was played in Jan Dvorak vs Martin Vacek?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jan Dvorak vs Martin Vacek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.