Maxim Dunn vs Ben Fearnley-Sanders
Hastings Weekend Open, 2024 · Result ½–½ · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maxim Dunn vs Ben Fearnley-Sanders with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maxim Dunn (1757)
- Black
- Ben Fearnley-Sanders (1860)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Hastings Weekend Open
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maxim Dunn (1757) and Ben Fearnley-Sanders (1860) was played at Hastings Weekend Open in 2024 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maxim Dunn games or Ben Fearnley-Sanders games? This Maxim Dunn vs Ben Fearnley-Sanders encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maxim Dunn vs Ben Fearnley-Sanders?
Maxim Dunn vs Ben Fearnley-Sanders (2024) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Maxim Dunn vs Ben Fearnley-Sanders?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (ECO C58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maxim Dunn vs Ben Fearnley-Sanders, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.