Egmond-Gabriel Dulman vs Grigore Vladulescu
date unknown · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System (E53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Egmond-Gabriel Dulman vs Grigore Vladulescu with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Egmond-Gabriel Dulman (2041)
- Black
- Grigore Vladulescu
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System (E53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Egmond-Gabriel Dulman (2041) and Grigore Vladulescu was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System (E53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Egmond-Gabriel Dulman games or Grigore Vladulescu games? This Egmond-Gabriel Dulman vs Grigore Vladulescu encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Egmond-Gabriel Dulman vs Grigore Vladulescu?
Egmond-Gabriel Dulman vs Grigore Vladulescu finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Egmond-Gabriel Dulman vs Grigore Vladulescu?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System (ECO E53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Egmond-Gabriel Dulman vs Grigore Vladulescu, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.