Zeev Dub vs David Berczes
FSIMB Oct, 2002 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Zeev Dub vs David Berczes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Zeev Dub (2270)
- Black
- David Berczes (2232)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FSIMB Oct
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Zeev Dub (2270) and David Berczes (2232) was played at FSIMB Oct in 2002 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Zeev Dub games or David Berczes games? This Zeev Dub vs David Berczes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Zeev Dub vs David Berczes?
Zeev Dub vs David Berczes (2002) finished 0–1, a win for David Berczes.
What opening was played in Zeev Dub vs David Berczes?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (ECO E39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Zeev Dub vs David Berczes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.